Encontros / Foto GettyImages

Festival Dança.Com privilegia encontros e conversas

Dança.Com had its first edition in Porto Alegre, from April 26 to May 2nd, produced by the City Culture Office, through its City Dance Center. One of the initial provocations, which worked to concentrate the efforts surrounding this initiative, was the intention to “establish not only one point, but multiple points of communication in dance production today”, in the words of Airton Tomazzoni, coordinator of the event.

The program was created following three guidelines: the body in the contemporary scene, the paths of performance and the use of new technologies. Distinct actions were grouped within these guidelines. They were made possible by different partners and were articulated through a line of thought that sought to favor possible connections, investing in encounters.

At this point, it is already possible to highlight another positive aspect of the event: the strategy to mobilize independent initiatives, establishing a “network of articulation and collaboration” that worked at the very production of the event, sharing its execution on an institutional level.

The City Dance Center acted in the project’s elaboration and development and articulated local artists such as Cibele Sastre, Luciana Paludo and Fernanda Carvalho Leite, among others. The initiative also allowed the action of dança em foco – – International Videodance Festival, which was responsible for the videodance showcase and a workshop; the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul organized the Body, Performance and Technology international seminar, through its Performing Arts Post-Graduate Program; the Itaú Cultural Itaú Cultural Rumos Dança program brought some of its recent edition’s process showcases.

Theoretically, the production such large events is made possible through partnerships. In reality, what can be observed is that such partnerships rarely allow a concrete opportunity for collaboration among the partners, contributing for shared management, which could allow mutual exchange that could result from them, bringing fresh air to rigid formats.

Another positive aspect is the fact that the event was concentrated mostly at Renascença Theater, where the Dance Center is also located, providing a homelike atmosphere to the event, homemade in the best sense, a place for caring and welcoming that favors permanence and prepares for daily destabilizations.

The choice of a lean program format was fortunate. The breaks between the scheduled activities and the lack clashing proposals allowed calm transitions for the audience and artists and a more constant participation throughout the whole program. The breaks also encouraged encounters, which often don´t take place in the usually hectic rhythm of festivals.

Thus, it was possible to share the experience of Canadian artist Andrew Harwood, for instance, as he talked about the years working with the Contact Improvisation with Steve Paxton and to watch him improvising alongside Paula Zacharias (Argentina) and Fernanda Carvalho Leite (Brazil). It was equally exciting to listen to Clarisse Bardiot (France) talk about 9 Evenings, an experimental event articulated by Robert Rauchenberg in 1996, in New York, and compare it to Ivani Santana describing her experience with Dance and New Technologies. It was equally important to see Leonel Brum, the dance coordinator of the National Arts Foundation, discuss the political aspect of some of the works, both theoretical and practical, within the Foundation’s new paths. What is the role of the artist in the establishment of public policies for dance in Brazil? What are the mobilization and participation roles we play – or do NOT play – in our cities, in order to make ourselves represented?

There are many possible connections when encounters take place. The intention of the event’s organizers and the willingness of all the partners pointed towards good perspectives of continuity for Dança.Com. Therefore, this is a reason for celebration, considering our vast national territory with such scarcity of powerful initiatives.

Let us remember Stuart Hall. He states that a “national culture is a discourse ¬ – a way to build meanings that influence and organize both our actions and the conception we have of ourselves.” (HALL, 2006, p.50) Hall proposes we think about national cultures as imagined communities. Considering national identities are not transmitted hereditarily, they are not born with us, it becomes clear that the nation produces meaning, a system of cultural representation that is established as a symbolic community. After this point, Benedict Anderson argues that national identity is an imagined community. And that is exactly why it is important we question ourselves about the representation strategies we use – and which we engender – in building our ideas of belonging and cultural identity.

According to Hall, three aspects should be taken into account in building a national culture in an imagined community: the memories of the past, the desire to live together and the perpetuation of heritage. He warns, however, that a national culture is never a point of loyalty, union and symbolic identification, it is also a structure of cultural power.

We evaluate the importance of such initiatives in the context of a city upon that issue. Not only because of the dimension of the encounters, but above all because of the evidence it casts on a community’s discourse, because of the meanings produced there, in a context in which its particularities are crossed by other flows and new assemblages that are established. With all the difficulties, problems and deficiencies that may arise, something beyond always becomes visible: ways of working and modes of existence, different time regimen, possible habitations, imagined communities and invisible cities.

Andréa Bardawil is a choreographer and pedagogical coordinator of Bienal Internacional de Dança do Ceará